Fred Goes To Hollywood!

So, I was looking through various sites for a good topic for this last blog (for the class, anyway), when I came across this article.

Fred is getting his own feature film.

For those of you who haven't had the...um, pleasure of seeing a Fred video on YouTube, let me break them down for you. Fred Figglehorn (a fictional character played by 16-year-old Lucas Cruikshank) is a six year old boy with a high pitched voice. He goes around doing random things, including standing up to a bully named Kevin and crushing on a trailer-trash girl named Judy. His mom is an alcoholic and his dad is in jail. Just to give you a taste of what this internet show is like, here is a video of Fred Going Swimming.

Even though Fred's videos tend to only feature offscreen voices that interact with him, there was a casting call put out for the movie, including parts for Judy and Kevin.

Now, despite whether or not you are a fan of Fred, I seriously have to question whether he can hold his own for a good hour and a half. It's true that Fred did a cameo on the kids' show iCarly, but what works on the internet has trouble translating on to the big screen. I don't think I have the patience to listen to that voice for that long.

So, what do you think of Fred getting his own movie? How do you think it will do on the big screen? Do you think his fan following is large enough that it will do better than a "regular" movie? What are your feelings personally on Fred?

Disney in the 21st Century: The Princess and the Frog

For those of you who haven't heard, Disney is releasing a 2-D animated musical on December 11th called The Princess and the Frog. It's about a young woman in New Orleans who gets turned into a frog after kissing a frog prince. The soundtrack and songs are by Randy Newman (Academy Award winner, Toy Story), who spent every summer in New Orleans as a kid. Not to jump the gun, but this movie looks really good. Musicals are my favorite kind of movies, and those old Disney musicals just take me back to my childhood and make me happy.

But it's going down a little different this time around. What do I mean? Well, there are so many more ways to market this movie with the internet. I remember going to the movie theater and seeing a preview for The Lion King. My mom said "We're going to that," and we planned for a few months ahead of time to go see it in the theater. A year ago, I remember going on the internet and looking at early pictures of the characters in this movie, and then planned a year in advance to go to the movie. Now, there are commercials , backstage access, "making of" featurettes, character analysis', the soundtrack is on Youtube...you can even view the first five minutes of the movie! Before the movie is even released.

There are still the regular marketing items: coloring books, bubble baths, Princess Tiana clothes, posters...(on a side note, I owned Lion King coloring crayons. Way better than regular ones).

So, what do you think? Have you heard of this movie? Are you going to see it? What was/is your favorite Disney movie? Did you have a favorite song? Who was your favorite character? Do you think the internet will help Disney roll in the cash, or will the fact that this is "old school" Disney do that all on its own?

[To answer my own questions, my favorite Disney movie is (tied) The Lion King, Mulan, Beauty and the Beast, I like "Reflection" and "I Just Can't Wait To Be King", my favorite character is Mulan because she defies typical female gender roles. I am going to see The Princess and the Frog and am bringing my six year old brother to it. I think that the combination of old school Disney and the internet will make this a high grossing film (that and it's rated G so all ages will go to see it. And Princess Tiana is the first black princess).]

Mystery Science Theater 3000 and Beyond!

[cue theme music]

Show of hands, how many of you actually know what my blog title is referring to? Well, Mystery Science Theater 3000 was a show from the 90's. The backstory of the show changed a lot in it's 10 season run, but the basic idea was to make fun of horrible movies, a show-within-a-show sort of feel. One thing always is consistent: a nice, regular guy named either Mike or Joel is stuck on a space satellite with two intelligent, sarcastic robots (Crow and Servo). A villain sends him tapes to conduct "experiments" on him to see how long he lasts watching a horrible movie, which he does with the help of humor.

I will be the first to admit it, the plot is non-existent (but as they say in the theme song "If you're wondering how he eats and breathes and other science facts, repeat to yourself it's just a show. I should really just relax"). It's an excuse to make fun of those B-grade movies that Mike and the gang are forced to watch. MST3K (as it's referred to by fans) began as a small station show in Minneapolis. After a few seasons, it was quite popular and Comedy Central picked it up, rocketing the cast to stardom. Although Comedy Central wanted to move the set and stars to New York or another upscale city to film, the cast was determined to keep filming from their dear state of Minnesota. They did so for the remainder of the show's run, keeping the original lure of the show with their everyday man approach to the movies, and not becoming spoiled stars.

Fast forward another 10 years. Where are Mike Nelson, Kevin Murphy (voice of Servo) and Bill Corbett (voice of Crow) now? Well, they moved from riffing on bad movies to...riffing on bad movies? But wait a minute...wasn't Mystery Science Theater cancelled back in 1999? Yes, it was, but the MST3K crew has a new venue called Rifftrax, an online site that they and Legend Films began in 2006. For only a few dollars, a consumer can purchase the "riffs" on popular movies from the Rifftrax website. The MST3K crew is keeping up with the times, using embedded video clips as samples of their work. They even involve their avid followers with iRiff, where a person can riff on movies themselves and send it in for a contest. They also have their own Youtube channel that they post fairly regularly on.

It's good to see that these guys are keeping up with internet tools. I personally think they are brilliant. They don't resort to vulgar jokes (not often, anyway) and are very cinematically well-rounded. Mike, Kevin, and Bill are intelligent guys who I can relate to and would want as friends.

What do you think of this? Do you think that these guys should utilize more Web 2.0 tools, and if so, which ones? Did you ever watch Mystery Science Theater? Did you like it? What about Rifftrax? Have you ever heard of this before?

Before you post, I'd highly, strongly, greatly recommend watching a few Rifftrax "best of's". I promise that you'll laugh at least once. Here are some of my favorites:

Twilight Rifftrax

The Dark Knight Rifftrax

Star Wars Rifftrax

Pirates of the Caribbean Rifftrax

Valley City Comedy Tonight!

I have had the pleasure of being a part of Valley City Comedy Tonight!, a Saturday Night Live-esque production that VCSU Theatre is putting on this Thursday through Saturday night. In this blog, I am going to talk about all the different Web tools that this production is using and promote it.

First off, I'm going to explain the show. VC:CT is a mixture of sketches (prepared mini-plays), improv (making stuff up on the spot during different "games"), stand up (student comedians doing...well, stand up), and video (some student-made and some made especially for the production).

VC:CT is utilizing technology like we never have before. I don't want to give too much away (you'll have to come see the show) but one of the sketches involves Facebook. For this skit, a Facebook page is shown up on a screen with one of the characters interacting with it on their own computer. The bit centers around the fact that people take Facebook more seriously than real life events.

Another Web aspect that this production is using is email during the Improv game "Pocket Lines". The point of the game is to pull a line from your pocket and say whatever is on the piece of paper, no matter how out of context it is. Instead of putting the lines on a piece of paper and putting it in your pocket, the improv performers will be getting suggestions from the audience via e-mail. I am not one of the people planning that out so I’m not sure exactly how it’s going to work. I personally think that pocket lines would work better than the e-mail. There is also no chance of a technical malfunction when using paper. That said, I’m sure that using the e-mail will be just as entertaining as the pocket lines.

The entire show will be streamed on the internet live (Here's the link to it). This is something that has never been done before in a VCSU production, but I think it’s a good idea. Parents can watch their children perform in a play even if they live across the country or even out of the country. Friends who can’t make your play can watch it instead.

One bad thing about the show being streamed: ticket sales might go down. If people can watch from the comfort of their home, what’s to stop them from making this the deciding factor on whether or not to go to a show?

So…food for thought. Do you think streaming VC:CT will effect ticket sales (Keep in mind, it’s in Theater 320)? Do you think it will impact VCSU in a positive way, a negative way, or neither? Do you think it is a good idea for the theater at Valley City to use the web tools this way?

If you’ve seen the play by the time you read this, either live or by streaming, please comment on what you thought and your favorite part(s). Lastly, are you planning on coming to see the production? Alicia Kelly wrote some of the sketches and Zack Lee is a director/performer. I urge you to check it out. It's going to be pretty funny.

Tear Down This Wall...Again

Today, November 9th marks two important dates in German history, one tragic and one triumphant. The tragic occured 71 years ago; the Nazis' Kristallnacht, or Night of the Broken Glass, an anti-Semantic tirade that caused the deaths of at least 91 German Jews, the destruction of hundreds of synagogues and vandalizing and looting of thousands of Jewish businesses in the state-sanctioned riots that night.

But November 9th also stands for hope, the day that the Berlin Wall was demolished, unifying East and West Germany into one again. To mark the 20th anniversary of the end of divided Germany, the country put up a fake "wall" (giant domino pieces installed along a stretch of the Berlin Wall's original path) at Brandenburg Gate and "tore" the wall down again. Reporting for NBC News was Tom Brokaw, the only anchor who reported live while the Berlin Wall was torn down the first time (link to his report from today). Brokaw shared some of his memories from 1989 and reported on the current events in Berlin. It was really cool to see Brokaw's 1989 broadcast next to his reporting that he did today. Brokaw's been around for a very long time.

I wasn't quite born when the Berlin Wall first went down (two weeks late!) Although I wasn't born, I know that this was a major event. It was the end of the Soviet Union and the end of the division of Germany. The United States saw it as much a win for them as they did for the Germans. My parents remember this day and they've lived in America their whole life. I can't imagine what it must have been like for the Germans who saw that wall torn down. I've heard stories where family members were separated by the wall. What would that have been like to finally see, say, your sister or your father after years of having a bit of wall separating you?

If you are old enough, do you remember when the Berlin Wall was torn down? How did you feel? What images do you remember the most? Did you see Tom Brokaw's broadcast from Berlin in 1989? How do you feel about the Berlin Wall in general? Do you think the Berlin Wall stood for something more than just a separated country?

A Gleeful Blog

I'm sure that you've at least heard the word "Glee" mentioned in the past months, be it on Facebook or in an actual conversation.

Glee is the newest Fox show, about a high school show choir with a rag-tag group of misfits including a diva, a jock, a soulful black girl, a gay boy, a kid in a wheelchair, a womanizer, a hypocritical cheerleader, and a punky Asian. The glee club, called New Directions, is taken over by Spanish teacher and former Glee member William Schuster. Mr. Shoe (as the kids call him) wants to return the glee club to its glory days and let the kids have tons of fun on the way. The only problem is that the cheerleading coach, Sue Sylvester, wants the glee club gone because her "Cheerios" are sharing the funds with the glee club.

The Fox Network took a big risk when they decided to show the pilot of "Glee" four months before the show would actually begin airing. This is unheard of in the world where episodic shows like Glee compete against reality television and broadcast TV. To keep up the buzz about the show, Glee delved into social networking, maintained an online presence, showcased the actors in malls across the country, and held a fan contest. The show embarked on an ambitious marketing scheme. Joe Earley, executive vice president of marketing and communications for Fox, said the show was screened at summer camps, stars engaged in a 10-city tour, street teams handed out "Glee"-related items, and trailers were shown in front of the latest "Harry Potter" film.

Online, characters had Facebook pages and Twitter accounts, the pilot was available for streaming, and the show's stars took handheld cameras to events to gather behind-the-scenes content. The director's cut of the pilot was followed by a "Tweet-peat" where the stars and the fans took to Twitter to discuss the episode.

Martin said he was present when Fox screened an episode at the geekiest of all events: Comic-Con in San Diego, California.

Such innovation may have to become the norm, "Particularly for those networks that skew younger such as Fox, CW and ABC to an extent, they are going to have to really promote all of their shows all year long and find new ways to keep them in front of their viewers and remind them that they are there," said Ed Martin, a television critic who writes for JackMyers.com. "What Fox did last spring was something totally new that had never been done before."

I have watched the current episodes of Glee, and I was impressed with the dance sequences, the choice of music, and the context in which it was used. Although I don't think the Glee versions of popular songs really compare to the original versions, it still has an emotional impact because of the story behind the song. In the case of "Don't Stop Believing", Mr. Shoe is thinking of giving up on his love of teaching and Glee Club to get a better paying job for his family, when he hears his students singing the Journey hit.

One thing I have to say about the show is that I was in show choir, and there is not nearly this much drama. The other problem I have with the show is that Mr. Shoe's wife is selfish and unlikeable, and we're expected to take this as the reason he should leave her and be with his neurotic co-worker, a school counselor. Well, if his wife is so terrible, then why did he fall in love with her in the first place? Plot device, that's why.

That being said, Glee is about finding the happy medium between keeping your hopes and dreams alive and being realistic. Is the storyline really that good? Well, I don't think so (and now they've burned out the go-to teen pregnancy plot line in the first episodes), but the dances are certainly creative and really fun to watch. Glee is a very marketable show and the fact that it is using social networking will only help propel it to Season 2.

Have you seen Glee? If so, what are you feelings on it? Do you think that it deserves all the hype it has gotten for the past months? Do you think that the extra publicity done for the show helped garner ratings for it?

And on that note, here's Kurt's Single Ladies Dance.

My Life Is Average vs. F-My Life: Who Will Win?

Yes, I know that this class is all about technology and well, digital communications. But this week, I feel like being different, hence the blog's title and the Milo and Otis picture, which has nothing to do with what I'm going to be talking about. I am going to compare and contrast two sites where people can post some of their life stories: My Life is Average and F-My Life.

My Life is Average (MLIA) posts short little paragraphs that chronicle a normal day with a weird quirk, an observation, or just something that someone did to make their life a little less "average".

Some of my favorites:

"Today, I saw a guy dressed like Waldo on my college campus. Trying to be funny, I walked up to him and said, "I found you!" He slipped me a dollar and said I didn't see anything. Well played Waldo. MLIA"

"Today, a new guy that I am dating asked me if I wanted some gum. I said sure expecting him to pull out Stride or something. He pulled out Bubble Tape, and ripped off an extra long piece for me. He's 21. I think I found the one. MLIA"

"Today, I found out my grandma has a myspace. And not only is her background a picture of David Beckham without a shirt, she has twice as many friends as me. MLIA."

"Today, my psychology class was talking about everyone's saddest moments they could remember. It was really awkward for the first few minutes because no one was saying anything. Then I said one of the times in my life I was saddest was when Ash Ketchum said goodbye to Butterfree and Pikachu. Everyone agreed. I love college. MLIA."

MLIA lets a registered person vote on each story with "average" or "meh". People can also leave comments for the story.

F-My Life (FML) is not about the little moments that make a person's day. It is about the moments that ruin them. Some examples:

"Today, my son's hamster died. It was overweight and got stuck in its plastic tube. My 6 year old son came downstairs to me smashing a plastic tube with a dead hamster in it on the kitchen table. He thinks I killed it. FML.

"Today, my boyfriend of five years gave me the silent treatment, refusing to talk to me or do anything more than glare at me during the entire three hour drive we took this morning. Why? Because I slept with his best friend. In his dream last night. FML. "

People can vote for each story with either "I agree, your life sucks" or "You totally deserved it". They can also leave a comment about the story.

I don't know if any of you have read either of these sites, but I've decided that I prefer My Life is Average to FML. I can relate to the stories more and the FML stories are pretty downbeat and depress me. MLIA is about finding the humor in a seemingly monotonous lifestyle. Although some of the people on FML seem to have had a really bad days, I just get a negative attitude from it. After all, some of the stories on MLIA could constitute as an FML story, but the person turned it around to be something funny and memorable.

What do you think? FML or MLIA? Do you have a MLIA or FML moment that sticks out in your mind? If so, please share :)

Seinfeld Trivia

Seinfeld Cast Reunites

Although Larry David, creator of Seinfeld, swore he would never do it, it is going to happen: a reunion. On this season of David's biographical-like show, Curb Your Enthusiasm, the four cast members (Jerry Seinfeld, Jason Alexander, Michael Richards, and Julia Louis-Dreyfuss) of the popular NBC show will reunite in the episode within the episode.

Seinfeld ran 1989 to 1998 in a staggering 9 season run. The show was popular for several reasons. The first reason was that it was episodic. Skipping around from season to season would not effect your understanding of the characters or the show. It also required no thinking to watch. Afterall, it was the "show about nothing". Seinfeld also pushed the envelope in some of its episodes, such as "The Contest", which was solely about masturbation. And lastly, the audience wasn't required to invest emotionally in the characters. The characters are selfish and morally deprived, but still fun to watch. The show never takes itself seriously. One episode centers around Jerry trying to get soup from a Soup Nazi ("No soup for you!"). The episodes usually had elements in it that everyone could relate to. For instance, one episode is about waiting in line at a Chinese restaurant, another is about getting lost in a parking garage.

And while the episodes are always very straightforward, some are just downright quirky, such as the episode where Jerry has to go on a talk show in a "puffy shirt". Another is about Jerry making a "pony remark" to his great aunt, and possibly causing her death by saying he hated anyone who owned a pony.
Although the last one mentioned might sound a little morbid, the show plays it off with humor (with success, I might add). The show takes on supposedly sensitive topics such as deformity (lady with the goiter, the Pig Man), open heart surgery (the Junior Mint) and even Susan's death.

I have great memories of staying up late (well...9 pm) and watching the newest Seinfeld episode with my mother. It was the one adult-ish show I was allowed to watch when I was little. I've seen every episode several times and I have a lot of the dialogue memorized. Seinfeld is episodic and pointless. But hilarious. It kind of taps into the monotony of life while still breathing life into the mundane activities the characters go through.

So...being a fan of the show, how do I feel about the reunion? I can't say that I'll watch it when it airs. I might catch it later on Hulu or the clip on YouTube. I have to say this: they'd better not mess it up.

So, how do you feel about reunions a decade after the fact? The Spice Girls? The Backstreet Boys (who I've heard are releasing a new album)? And now Seinfeld? Do you think it's a way for the fans of the old show to reminisce or is it just a way to cash in on some moolah?

Also, I don't know if there are any other Seinfeld fans out there. If so, tell me about your favorite part of the show and why you liked it. One of my favorite moment is the episode where Jerry puts a Tweety Pez dispenser on Elaine's leg, which makes her laugh, which in turn ruins a very regal and elegant piano recital. A few years ago, I got a Tweety Pez dispenser and did this to my mom at a concert. She lost it completely and couldn't stop laughing.

Black Like Me

I'm sure most of you are aware of Robert Downey Jr's performance in the 2008 comedy Tropic Thunder. In it, Downey plays an Australian actor who undergoes a controversial surgery to become black-skinned for a war movie. Of course in real life Downey didn't get that sort of procedure done. The makeup crew used "blackface", which is the term for a white actor who puts black makeup on and portrays a black character. Although I haven't personally seen Tropic Thunder, I've seen some clips of Downey's performance. My impression was that he did a good job with the role. He was even nominated for a 2008 Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor (losing out to Heath Ledger's terrifying Joker in The Dark Knight).

Blackface was more common before the Civil Rights movement, appearing in shows like Amos and Andy and a performance by Vernon and Ryan in 1950. However, I was scanning through the news recently and found several mentions of it within a week.

First instance: an Australian show, Hey Hey It's Saturday (which felt reminiscent of Saturday Night Live) showcased a group called the Jackson Jive. This group was of six white men. Five of them had painted black onto their faces, and the one guy portraying Michael Jackson painted his face with very white paint. An American actor/singer Harry Connick Jr, who was one of the judges, was very offended, giving the group a big fat zero for a score and expressing his disgust. The show later apologized to Connick Jr. and the American politely explained why he was offended as an American in general.




The other instance of blackface in recent media was an issue of Vogue, which featured a white model in blackface posing in typically black ethnic clothing. The magazine did not comment on the pictures.

Blackface is generally very offensive to Americans. The term is often associated with the older blackface movies, with white actors portraying black people as incompetent, or perhaps making fun of the way they spoke and/or some of their mannerisms.

My thoughts on blackface? The older clips I found (from the early to mid 1900's) on it were very offensive. It hurt me just to watch them.

As for the Jackson Jive...they are Australian. I know that is not an excuse for being tactless, but I am reading a book on Australian culture for another class, and Australians are very open, very liberal. It is a culture where basically "anything goes". Take a joke or get out. Racist jokes are a way of life there, which explains why the Australian judges at Hey Hey It's Saturday weren't as offended as Harry Connick Jr. was. I think that the skit was just trying to emphasize the fact that Michael Jackson was much whiter than the rest of his family and sort of show him as the black sheep (hmmm...poor choice of words). I personally thought it was a bit tasteless, but at least they weren't portraying the Jackson Five as blithering idiots like earlier blackface "comedy" routines did. Their dancing was actually quite good.

As for the pictures in Vogue, I don't understand what was going through Vogue's head. How did they not think that someone in the world wouldn't be offended by a white person putting on black makeup and posing in traditional African dress? Couldn't Vogue, rich as they are, have found a black model to pose for those pictures? Less makeup expenses, less controversy, all around better deal.

What are your thoughts on blackface? Do you find it completely offensive? Are people (of all ethnicities) overreacting to it? Is the whole thing being overblown? What do you think would happen if a black actor did "whiteface"?

Kate Plus Eight Minus Jon

Every time I looked at a magazine cover this summer, there they were. The tabloids followed their every movement, goaded by an entire nation that was lapping up all the coverage of the real-lives of Jon and Kate Gosselin.

If you don't know who Jon and Kate are, then I'd have to ask if you've been in a serious coma over the past year or so. Jon and Kate Gosselin, as well as their eight children, are (or at least they were) the stars of popular reality show Jon and Kate Plus Eight, a reality show following everyday occurances within the Gosselin family. Here's a quick intro of the family...

In earlier seasons, the husband and wife appeared to be very devoted to each other, despite their occasionally scuffles and arguments. However, in summer 2009, their marriage began unraveling in front of an entire nation. Jon was often seen in the tabloids with a much younger woman, under circumstances that he originally claimed was innocent. As the summer went on, Jon and Kate separated, then divorced. Jon is now with the younger woman, the daughter of the man who performed Kate's infamous tummy tuck.

The show is still running on the TLC channel, under the new name Kate Plus Eight. When asked for her reasons for continuing the show, Kate Gosselin said, "I do the show for my family because I believe it provides us opportunities we wouldn't otherwise have. Jon used to share that belief until as recently as the day the network announced the name change of the show and indicated that Jon would have a lesser role in the show."

Jon recently went on Good Morning America, and began verbally attacking Kate. "I despise her," he said, also adding that Kate "beat me down... like a lame fish" and that their relationship "can't be fixed"(CNN). He also claimed that Kate stole his wedding ring, and that is why he no longer wears it.

I didn't avidly follow every single event going on in the Gosselin household, but it was impossible to miss the major things. Their separation, their divorce, and the fact that Jon is going out with a 20-something year old now.

I was a fan of Jon and Kate Plus Eight when it was first starting out. I loved the simplicity of the show (and the kids of course) and could relate to having a large family. Jon and Kate even reminded me a little of my mom and dad. But now, it seems that it has just sold out to Hollywood. Kate dresses up her kids to match each other all the time and she herself never looks anything less than perfect. In the earlier episodes, she would wear sweatpants and sometimes go without makeup, but not anymore. Do you think that Jon and Kate Plus Eight has ceased to be a reality show in the recent seasons?

Many have questioned the Gosselin parents' decision to keep filming their children for the show while their family is going through such a rough time. Do you think that media exploitation of the family somehow helped spark the divorce of the Gosselins? Do you think it is right to have reality shows like Jon and Kate Plus Eight, especially when there are children involved? What do you think of the concept of the show Kate Plus Eight (No Jon)? And what do you think about the Gosselin parents themselves and about Jon's recent comments on Good Morning America?

One Word You Can't Say On Television

Way to start the season with a bang, Saturday Night Live! Or more appropriately, a bomb. That's right, the comedy show that performs skits live on the NBC Channel, let the f-bomb slip during a sketch called "Biker Chick Chat". Newcomer Jenny Slate, who was playing one of the Biker Chicks (along with hostess Megan Fox and Kristen Wiig), let the expletive escape her lips in, ironically, a skit that was based on NOT saying the f-word.

Immediately after letting the word tumble out of her mouth, Jenny Slate puffed out her cheeks, perhaps realizing her mistake...and the show went on with hardly a pause and no humongous "OOOOOOO!" from the audience. (But if you watch the clip, there seems to be a slight awkward pause and brief gasp, though).

Afterward, Slate expressed worries over being fired, but it doesn't look as though she will be. She will probably just have a fine slapped on her from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for using the expletive. NBC declined to comment on the incident, other than to say the word had been restored to the intended "freakin'" for the show's replays in western time zones.

I really think that Slate handled herself well. She finished the skit and didn't let her, ahem, muck-up stop her from performing. That being said, I am not a particular fan of SNL. I really think the show has gone downhill, especially in the last decade. I don't really watch it unless I hear about a particular skit, but when I do watch it, it rarely makes me laugh. The jokes are just not funny. I mean, the most memorable thing about last week's episode was not a particular skit or Megan Fox's bland performance. The most memorable thing about last Saturday's show was someone saying the f-word, which any loose-lipped person can do.

First of all, I want to say that comedy is an art. It is difficult to do. Not every joke will be funny to every person. But I hate to see comics and just everyday people saying expletive after expletive when they talk (cough...Dane Cook). To me personally, it is the easy way out; an easy way to get a laugh just from the pure shock value. The joke might not even require an intelligent observation or even be funny, but throw in an f-word and boom...instant applause.

Comedy aside, let's briefly talk about censorship. As you are most certainly aware, there can't be any f-words on regular television. HBO, yes, but regular television? I'm not against self-expression, but I think that censorship is a very good thing. I think it forces the writers to be creative in the way they word things, to make questionable material more subtle or just a little less vulgar. I also appreciate it when I am watching something with my little 6-year-old brother. I don't want him picking up those words from TV.

What are your thoughts on censorship on television? Do you think that the FCC has the right to fine people for accidentally saying a word? What do you think television would be like if you could say the seven words you can't say on television?

Concerning the Saturday Night Live fiasco: It wasn't the first time something like this has happened. The f-word has accidentally gotten through other live news feeds, such as another slip-up on SNL in 1981 by Charles Rocket, and a veteran New York City news anchor while on the air.

I want to know your thoughts about this entire thing. How do you feel about SNL? About censorship in the media?

Surrogates

Some days I just don’t want to get up for class...okay, every day. But school is something I am paying for and will help me in the long run, so I drag myself out of bed and cowboy up. But what if…I sent my robot counterpart to class in my stead? It could take my notes and record what the teacher says. It would look just like any other human.

What if I had a surrogate?

Yes, I am referencing the Bruce Willis movie coming out on Friday. The plot of the movie, aptly called “Surrogates”, is that the world is nothing but people sitting in their chairs living through their robots, or surrogates. Then, for the first time in years, someone is murdered in a world where no one worries about pain or crime, since those things are all happening to the robots, which are quick to heal.

I know this sounds like an intriguing plot for a movie, but how far is this from becoming a reality? Of course it is science-fiction, but could this “robot world” ever become a daily occurrence? According to an article on CNN.com, armies are already using remote-controlled robots to destroy land mines and attack enemies. There is also emerging technology for handicapped people that allows them to operate robotic limbs and control computer cursors without using a keyboard. There is also “telepresence” technology that is letting people see, hear, walk, talk, and gesture using human sized robots that are across the world.

To quote from the CNN article: "There are a lot of real-world components to this," said robotics expert and author Daniel H. Wilson, "Clearly, there are not fully functional humanoid robots ... but there are a lot of components to telepresence that already exist."

The director of the “Surrogates” movie, Jonathan Mostow (Terminator 3:Rise of the Machines), also shared his thoughts on evolving robotics, “To me, it's not even a question of the technology. Technology always catches up. The question is, is some universal human urge being met by this invention? It seems to me we have a fundamental human desire to be lazy, to sort of not have to do things in person and to do it remotely.”

Indeed, robotics at Anybot, a company founded in 2001 by Trevor Blackwell, already has “anybots” in the development phase that can run, jump and climb stairs, and come with fully articulated hands designed to perform increasingly human-like tasks. The robot even resembles a human. (However, they cost $30,000 right now. Anybot is working on lowering the price).

Blackwell said he's not sure the technology will ever advance to the level imagined in "Surrogates"

Concerning the movie “Surrogates”, Anybot founder Blackwell said, "I don't know if we'll ever get quite to that level, of being that realistic.”

Immediately after seeing a trailer for this movie I was thinking about how people are so busy “living” in the different worlds of the internet that they aren’t really living in real life. Maybe we’re already living in a world of “surrogates” and this movie is just embodying that concept in a different way.

Just a deep moment I had there.

What are your thoughts? Do you think surrogates could actually happen in the future? Do you want them to? What would you have a surrogate do for you? :)